Ok, yes, on page optimization plays an important role here as well, I haven’t checked, but this was just a quick example.īut, the gist of this is, 2 or 3 links to this page aren’t super hard to acquire. The number 1 ranking at the moment also has a DR of 69, which is lower than Droplr’s DR of 72, meaning, if they were to compete on backlinks, the higher DR would probably win. I’m assuming with just a few links (2/3 to be pessimistic), Droplr’s article would probably to jump straight into positIon 1, going from 31 to 135 traffic (Ahrefs estimation). Most pages ranking in the top 10 have zero backlinks. So I took a look at Droplr’s link growth for the past few months and noticed it’s been a bit slow (although they are recovering from that dip there): domains (links passing “juice”).Ĭould number 3 be the reason for number 2 (traffic discrepancy)?
They both have a similar number of referring domains (unique sites linking to them) but a bit less dofollow ref. CloudApp has a ton more traffic than Droplr.ģ. They both have similar DR (strength of the domain, in terms of links)Ģ.
Let’s fire up the good ol’ Ahrefs account and put both domains into the batch analysis tool:ġ. Today we’re looking at two of the best screen capture and sharing tools on the market to see how they’re doing in terms of link building: Screen sharing and capturing technology has changed quite a lot in recent years with the creation of SaaS platforms that allow us to share our screens in real time, capture images and edit all of that in a snap. Screenshots are 90% of the images I use on this blog, and there’s a reason for that, they’re one of the best ways to quickly show people how something is done. They can add buttons to Chrome's toolbars, intercept web requests, change the DOM, etc.Ever used screenshots in your marketing, emails, SOPs, articles or slack conversations? even if those applications are just websites.Įxtensions can actually affect the way that the browser behaves (ad blocking, e.g.). Since Chrome OS won't have any native applications apart from Chrome, they need some way for you to be able to "install" applications. Google seems to have introduced them in order to make their browser more "operating system"-like, in preparation for tablets running Chrome OS. They're basically just glorified bookmarks. Apps don’t combine with other apps in this way they run standalone, like any regular website.įrom what I can tell, Chrome apps are just web applications that are registered with Chrome's Web Store (Gmail, e.g.). You can alter web pages too-for example, embed a “mail this” button next to every link in every page, or customize the layout of your favorite website.Ĭompared to apps, extensions cut across websites and web apps they are usually in effect across all websites (though some are site-specific). Similarly, you can introduce new items to the context menu, change the behavior of the omnibox (the input field on the address bar), access the user’s browsing history (with consent), and much more. Buttons like this can also apply to the current website being viewed-for example, click the currency converter button to convert all prices on the website you’re viewing. For example, they can extend Google Chrome by adding a new button to the address bar, such as an ever-present currency converter. extend the functionality of Google Chrome and the websites being viewed in it. Google Chrome is just formalizing the web app concept in a way that will be familiar to anyone who’s used apps on a smartphone.Įxtensions. Examples include games, photo editors, and video players all of these categories are viable as tightly focused apps running inside the browser. We’ve already had the concept of “web apps” in the browser for a few years, as something more rich and interactive than a website, but less cumbersome and monolithic than a desktop application.
0 kommentar(er)
